feat(knowledge): 语义检索打通——切片、混合打分、只搜已发布
CI / backend (push) Canceled after 0s

之前知识只能"存",不能"找"。这一版把链路补上:切片 → 向量 → 打分 → 带来源返回。

- chunk 表 + 迁移 0006:正文按标题归段切、代码块整块保留、超长按句切、
  相邻片重叠 80 字;RLS 与 GRANT 与其它租户表一致
- 向量提供方做成协议:内置 hash(字符二元组,零依赖可复现,作为基线)
  与 OpenAI 兼容端点两种,换实现不动业务代码
- 检索是混合打分:向量 0.6 + pg_trgm 0.4。专有编号、单号这类必须原样命中的词
  靠词法兜,换个说法表达的同一件事靠向量兜
- 三条纪律:只搜 published(过滤写在 SQL 里)、低于阈值宁可不返回、
  每条命中都带来源标题与 item_id
- 发布时自动建索引,改完正文用 POST /knowledge/{id}/reindex 重建
- Web 知识页加检索框与命中卡片;新增 e2e/retrieval.mjs 6 项

为什么不是 pgvector:本机 Docker 起不来、fnsvr-01 没有该扩展且明确不动。
先用 real[] + SQL 余弦把链路跑通,将来换列类型与索引即可,接口不变。

后端 79 passed,e2e smoke/knowledge/richtext/retrieval 全绿。
This commit is contained in:
dadao
2026-10-29 04:28:09 +08:00
parent d509f0c335
commit d079564d6c
16 changed files with 1126 additions and 22 deletions
+131
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,131 @@
"""文本向量化(M3)。
为什么要抽象一层:今天用内置的哈希向量,明天换成 OpenAI 兼容的 `/embeddings`,
后天可能换成自建模型。检索代码只依赖 `embed() -> list[float]`,换实现不动业务。
内置 `HashEmbedding` 的诚实说明:它不是"语义模型",是**字符 n-gram 的哈希词袋**。
它能把同词、近义写法("发票"/"票据"这种)之外的东西区分开,抓不到真正的语义相似。
之所以先上它:本机没有可用的向量库与模型服务,检索链路不能一直不落地;
而且它零依赖、可复现(同样的文本永远同样的向量),适合做测试基线。
真上线前应当把 `EMBEDDING_PROVIDER` 换成 `openai`,并把已发布知识整体重建一次。
"""
from __future__ import annotations
import hashlib
import math
import re
from collections.abc import Sequence
from typing import Protocol
import httpx
from ..config import Settings, get_settings
CJK_RE = re.compile(r"[\u4e00-\u9fff]")
WORD_RE = re.compile(r"[a-z0-9]+")
class EmbeddingProvider(Protocol):
"""向量提供方。`name` 会写进切片,换模型后能看出哪些是旧向量。"""
name: str
async def embed(self, texts: Sequence[str]) -> list[list[float]]: ...
def _tokens(text: str) -> list[str]:
"""中文按字二元组、英文按词。
中文不用分词器:单字太碎("发""票"都对不上"发票"),二元组能拿到大多数
有意义的搭配,又不需要维护词典。
"""
lowered = text.lower()
tokens = WORD_RE.findall(lowered)
chars = [c for c in lowered if CJK_RE.match(c)]
tokens.extend(chars[i] + chars[i + 1] for i in range(len(chars) - 1))
tokens.extend(chars)
return tokens
class HashEmbedding:
"""字符 n-gram 的带符号哈希词袋,L2 归一化。"""
def __init__(self, dim: int = 256) -> None:
self.dim = dim
self.name = f"hash-{dim}"
async def embed(self, texts: Sequence[str]) -> list[list[float]]:
return [self._one(text) for text in texts]
def _one(self, text: str) -> list[float]:
vector = [0.0] * self.dim
counts: dict[str, int] = {}
for token in _tokens(text):
counts[token] = counts.get(token, 0) + 1
for token, count in counts.items():
digest = hashlib.blake2b(token.encode("utf-8"), digest_size=8).digest()
raw = int.from_bytes(digest, "big")
index = raw % self.dim
# 用最高位决定正负:无符号哈希会让不相干的词在向量里越加越像
sign = 1.0 if (raw >> 63) & 1 else -1.0
vector[index] += sign * (1.0 + math.log(count))
norm = math.sqrt(sum(v * v for v in vector))
if norm == 0:
return vector
return [v / norm for v in vector]
class OpenAIEmbedding:
"""任何 OpenAI 兼容的 `/embeddings` 端点(BYOK)。"""
def __init__(self, *, base_url: str, api_key: str, model: str) -> None:
self.base_url = base_url.rstrip("/")
self.api_key = api_key
self.model = model
self.name = f"openai:{model}"
async def embed(self, texts: Sequence[str]) -> list[list[float]]:
if not texts:
return []
async with httpx.AsyncClient(timeout=30.0) as client:
response = await client.post(
f"{self.base_url}/embeddings",
headers={"Authorization": f"Bearer {self.api_key}"},
json={"model": self.model, "input": list(texts)},
)
response.raise_for_status()
payload = response.json()
# 按 index 排序:并发端点的返回顺序没有保证
rows = sorted(payload["data"], key=lambda row: row["index"])
return [row["embedding"] for row in rows]
_provider: EmbeddingProvider | None = None
def get_provider(settings: Settings | None = None) -> EmbeddingProvider:
"""进程内单例:哈希实现无状态,OpenAI 实现也不需要每次新建连接池。"""
global _provider
if _provider is not None:
return _provider
settings = settings or get_settings()
if settings.embedding_provider == "openai":
if not settings.embedding_api_key:
raise RuntimeError(
"EMBEDDING_PROVIDER=openai 但没有配置 EMBEDDING_API_KEY;"
"要么补上密钥,要么改回 hash"
)
_provider = OpenAIEmbedding(
base_url=settings.embedding_base_url,
api_key=settings.embedding_api_key,
model=settings.embedding_model,
)
else:
_provider = HashEmbedding()
return _provider
def reset_provider_for_tests() -> None:
global _provider
_provider = None
+208
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,208 @@
"""知识的切片索引与检索(M3)。
两条硬规则:
1. **只有 `published` 的知识能被检索到**。草稿是"还没被人认可的话",
让它进检索等于把猜测当结论引用出去。过滤写在 SQL 里,不靠调用方自觉。
2. **检索必须带来源**。每个命中都返回 `item_id` 与标题,用户能点回去看原文;
这和 D3(知识必须有来源)是同一条原则的延伸——不给"出处不存在"的答案。
评分是向量与词法的加权和:
- 向量负责"说的是同一件事但换了词";
- 词法(pg_trgm 的 trigram 相似度)负责"专有名词、单号、人名"这类必须原样命中的词,
而哈希向量对这类词并不敏感。
两者都不足时宁可返回空,也不硬凑一条不相关的结果——检索失败比误导便宜。
"""
from __future__ import annotations
import uuid
from typing import Any
from sqlalchemy import delete, select, text
from sqlalchemy.ext.asyncio import AsyncSession
from ..config import get_settings
from ..domain.chunking import split_markdown
from ..errors import AppError, ErrorCode
from ..models_knowledge import Chunk, KnowledgeDoc
from ..models_task import Item
from .embedding import get_provider
SEARCH_SQL = text(
"""
SELECT c.item_id,
i.title,
k.doc_type,
c.idx,
c.heading,
c.content,
coalesce(app_cosine(c.embedding, CAST(:qvec AS real[])), 0) AS vec_score,
coalesce(similarity(c.content, :q), 0) AS lex_score
FROM chunk c
JOIN item i ON i.id = c.item_id AND i.workspace_id = c.workspace_id
JOIN knowledge_doc k ON k.item_id = c.item_id AND k.workspace_id = c.workspace_id
WHERE c.workspace_id = :ws
AND k.status_hint = 'published'
ORDER BY (
coalesce(app_cosine(c.embedding, CAST(:qvec AS real[])), 0) * :vw
+ coalesce(similarity(c.content, :q), 0) * :lw
) DESC, c.item_id, c.idx
LIMIT :limit
"""
)
def _vector_param(values: list[float]) -> list[float]:
"""把向量交给驱动去编码。
一开始我拼成 `'{0.1,0.2}'` 字符串再 `CAST(... AS real[])`,asyncpg 会因为 CAST
已经告诉它"这是数组"而拒绝字符串(`a sized iterable container expected`)。
直接传 list 最省事;非有限值替换成 0,免得 NaN 进 SQL 变成错误输入。
"""
return [value if value == value and abs(value) != float("inf") else 0.0 for value in values]
async def reindex_document(
session: AsyncSession,
ws_id: uuid.UUID,
item_id: uuid.UUID,
) -> int:
"""重建一份知识的切片,返回切片数。
全量重建而不是增量:知识正文改动通常牵动上下几段,增量对齐的复杂度
换不来多少收益(一份知识撑死几十片)。
"""
item = (
await session.execute(select(Item).where(Item.workspace_id == ws_id, Item.id == item_id))
).scalar_one_or_none()
if item is None:
raise AppError(ErrorCode.ITEM_NOT_FOUND, "这件事不存在")
doc = (
await session.execute(
select(KnowledgeDoc).where(
KnowledgeDoc.workspace_id == ws_id,
KnowledgeDoc.item_id == item_id,
)
)
).scalar_one_or_none()
if doc is None:
raise AppError(ErrorCode.KNOWLEDGE_NOT_FOUND, "这份知识不存在")
settings = get_settings()
source = "\n\n".join(part for part in (item.title, item.body_md or "") if part)
drafts = split_markdown(
source,
max_chars=settings.chunk_max_chars,
overlap=settings.chunk_overlap_chars,
)
provider = get_provider(settings)
vectors = await provider.embed([draft.content for draft in drafts]) if drafts else []
await session.execute(
delete(Chunk).where(Chunk.workspace_id == ws_id, Chunk.item_id == item_id)
)
for index, (draft, vector) in enumerate(zip(drafts, vectors, strict=True)):
session.add(
Chunk(
workspace_id=ws_id,
item_id=item_id,
idx=index,
heading=draft.heading,
content=draft.content,
char_count=len(draft.content),
embedding=vector,
embed_model=provider.name,
)
)
doc.chunk_count = len(drafts)
await session.flush()
return len(drafts)
async def search_knowledge(
session: AsyncSession,
ws_id: uuid.UUID,
query: str,
*,
limit: int = 10,
mode: str = "hybrid",
) -> list[dict[str, Any]]:
"""检索已发布知识,返回按相关度排序的切片。
`mode`: hybrid(默认)/ vector / keyword —— 前两者主要用于对比效果。
"""
cleaned = (query or "").strip()
if not cleaned:
return []
settings = get_settings()
provider = get_provider(settings)
query_vector = (await provider.embed([cleaned]))[0]
if mode == "vector":
vector_weight, lexical_weight = 1.0, 0.0
elif mode == "keyword":
vector_weight, lexical_weight = 0.0, 1.0
else:
vector_weight, lexical_weight = (
settings.search_vector_weight,
settings.search_lexical_weight,
)
rows = (
await session.execute(
SEARCH_SQL,
{
"qvec": _vector_param(query_vector),
"q": cleaned,
"ws": str(ws_id),
"vw": vector_weight,
"lw": lexical_weight,
"limit": limit,
},
)
).mappings()
hits: list[dict[str, Any]] = []
for row in rows:
vector_score = float(row["vec_score"] or 0.0)
lexical_score = float(row["lex_score"] or 0.0)
hits.append(
{
"item_id": row["item_id"],
"title": row["title"],
"doc_type": row["doc_type"],
"idx": row["idx"],
"heading": row["heading"],
"content": row["content"],
"score": round(vector_score * vector_weight + lexical_score * lexical_weight, 4),
"vector_score": round(vector_score, 4),
"lexical_score": round(lexical_score, 4),
}
)
hits = [hit for hit in hits if hit["score"] >= settings.search_min_score]
return hits
async def reindex_workspace(session: AsyncSession, ws_id: uuid.UUID) -> int:
"""把一个工作区里已发布的知识全部重建,返回处理的知识份数。
换 embedding 模型之后必须整体跑一次,否则新旧向量混在一张表里,
相似度分数没法比较。
"""
item_ids = (
await session.execute(
select(KnowledgeDoc.item_id).where(
KnowledgeDoc.workspace_id == ws_id,
KnowledgeDoc.status_hint == "published",
)
)
).scalars()
count = 0
for item_id in item_ids:
await reindex_document(session, ws_id, item_id)
count += 1
return count
+3 -1
View File
@@ -37,7 +37,9 @@ def sign(workspace_id: uuid.UUID, attachment_id: uuid.UUID, ttl_seconds: int | N
return f"exp={exp}&sig={_digest(workspace_id, attachment_id, exp)}"
def verify(workspace_id: uuid.UUID, attachment_id: uuid.UUID, exp: int | None, sig: str | None) -> bool:
def verify(
workspace_id: uuid.UUID, attachment_id: uuid.UUID, exp: int | None, sig: str | None
) -> bool:
if not exp or not sig:
return False
if exp < int(time.time()): # 过期就是过期,不给宽限